Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi

Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi

Study on the Properties Painting Between Aegean’s Civilization……. Research Paper

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Firoozeh Nawab Akbar 1
Bahman Firoozmandi Shire gini 2
Kamaluddin Niknamie 2
1 PhD in Skilled Archaeology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
2 Professor Archaeology, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch
http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/rahpooyesoore.3.2.5
Abstract
The present study is a study of the frescoes of the Aegean civilizations (Minoan, Mycenaean). The art of Mural Painting has begun from hunter-gatherer artists who lived in the Stone Age. A one-time flowering of the Stone Age has occurred in the Origen. Modern man has been able to create works in the aforementioned fields 40000 years ago and to apply them in everyday life is likely a ritual (Khalili Zarea; 2011).Human activity and its purpose is to convey the highest and best emotions that humanists have achieved. With the help of art designs, he expresses his feelings to all people and this is true not only of the present but of the past and the future (Tolstoy; 1994).Areas of study of the treatise include the art of civilization of the Island of Crete (Minoan civilization) and the civilization of Mycenaean located in the mainland of Greece in the second millennium BC. The main purpose of this dissertation was to study the features of the mural art of the Aegean civilization palaces.The main purpose of the dissertation is to study the following civilizations:
1. Mural study of the Knossos palace.
2. Study of the mural painting of Hagia Triada palace.
3. Mural study of the palace of Tyrense.
Number 1 and 2, relating to the palaces of the Minoan civilization, are 1600 and 1400 of BC.
And number 3related to the Mycenaean civilization, is 140- 110 of B C. The main purpose of this study, using aesthetic theory in the field of archaeological art, is to demonstrate the wall artistic features of Aegean civilization. The information was collect through library studies. The research method was a descriptive analytic study that was used to interpret the data in three methods: 1- combined interpretation, 2- analytical methods, and 3- semiotics.The resource and information collection required, 58 sample images were selected from all the collected images. The questionnaire key, consisting of 28 main questions designed with reference to the sources. The questions coded and then transferred to the Excel program and the qualitative codes became quantitative. Data processing: performed by SPSS software.
The research results are in the following sections: statistical (inferential, descriptive) and anthropological.
The result of the inferential statistical analysis showed that the positive correlation coefficient between the arts of the Knossos palace with the painting of Hagia Triada indicates a significant relation between the aforementioned two- state painting. This means that only the two Aegean cones and the Hagia Triada have been influential. From a semiotic perspective. Importance of internal issues. Coordination, creativity and imagination (combining, subjectivity and objectivity). The themes of the paintings have been mythical, social and atrocious.Descriptive statistics showed that: All three palaces differed in color (bright, saturated, contrasting colors), and in content (mythical, social, elemental war themes). In other words, the results show how the paintings of Aegean civilization were of impressionism style and that of the Imperial style.
The results of the semiotics indicate that the Aegean has been concerned with intrinsic issues.
Keywords
Mural Painting
Civilization Aegean
Minoan
Mycenaean
منابع فارسی
آژند، یعقوب(1390)، تاریخ هنرباستان، سمت،تهران.
استاکستد،    مریلین (1392)،   تاریخ      هنر   جهان به انضمام  عناصر معماری دوران. بهزاد، امین سلماسی، آناهیتا، مقبلی، فخراکیا، تهران.
بدوی، اصغر(1390)، «بررسی تاریخچه و قابلیت های فنی نقاشی فرسک»، تهران، وزارت علوم تحقیقات  و فناوری، دانشگاه هنر، دانشکده هنرهای تجسمی، ص 14،19،16،139.
تولستوی، لئون،(1373)، هنرچیست؟، کاوه، دهقان، امیرکبیر، تهران.
دی، کی، چینگ،فرانسیس، مارک ام، پارسومیک(1389)، تاریخ معماری جهان، محمدرضا، افضلی، یزدا، تهران.
دورانت، ویل(1340)، تاریخ تمدن، یونان باستان، تمدن اژه ای و تکامل یونان، ا، ح، آریان پور، اقبال، تهران.
زارع خلیلی، مرضیه، حسن،بلخاری قمی (1390)، « تأملی  در آغازین جلوه های هنری درتاریخ بشر(نقاشی و پیکره سازی) بررسی موردی آثار غارهای شوه، هولوفکنر و محوطه سونگیر»، تهران، دوفصلنامه هنرهای تجسمی، شماره دوم، پائیز و زمستان، ص 90،103.
ژیلیان، رز(1394)، روش و روش شناسی تحلیل تصویر، جمال الدین، اکبرزاده جهرمی، تهران، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات/ مرکزپژوهش ها وسنجش افکار صدا و سیما.
شفرد، راوناو راپرت، (بی تا)، 1000 نماد در هنر و اسطوره. شکل به چه معناست، آزاده، بیداربخت، نسترن، لواسانی، نشر نی، تهران.
وودفورد،سوزان(1386)، تاریخ هنر، حسن، افشار، مرکز، تهران.
هاسپرز،جان،راجر،اسکراتن(1379)،فلسفه هنر و زیبائی شناسی، یعقوب، آژند، دانشگاه تهران، تهران.
هارت، فردریک(1382)، سی و دو هزارسال تاریخ هنر. نقاشی، پیکرتراشی، معماری، موسی،اکرمی، بهزاد برکت ودیگران. تهران، پیکان.
منابع لاتین
Aleouppi, E, A. G, Kardias and T, Paradellis, 2000, “ Pigment Analysis of Wall Paintings and ceramics from Greece and Cyprus” , The Optimum Use of X Ra y Spectrometry on Specific Archaeological Issues, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., P 18,24.
Ancient Greek art, 2016, Coo1: “Greek Art Pots, stones and Mosaics”, P 1, 2.
Charbonneau, Amelie, 2011, “Minoan Art and the Phaeacians”, Dawson College,P1,6.
Chapin, Anneu P,2016,“Aegean painting in the Bronze Age” , Cambridge, University press, P 1 ,10.
Day, Jo, 2013, “Botany meets archaeology: people and plants in the past”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol.64, no Si,P1,12.ht
Debbo, Nicola Jane,--, “The Role of the Women in thFrescoes from Akrotiri”,Queens University Kingston, Ontario, Canada, National Library of Canada.P1,205.
Dietrich, Wolf, Barbara Neimeir, 1989, Minoan Frescoes in the Eastern Mediterranean, P 69,98.
Demargen, Pierre, 1958, Aegean Art the Origin, of Greek Art, Thames and Hudson,P 6,21.
Dawn Cain, Candace, 1997, “The question of narrative in Aegean Bronze Age Art”, University of Toronto, History of Art Department Thesis od Doctor of Philosophy,p 1,376.
Encyclopedia Universal Dell, Arte, 1965, vole X, McGraw-Hill, Book Company, INC, New York, Toronto, London, Italy.
Honour, Hugh, John Feleming, 1982, A world History of Art, P50,89.
Higgins, Reynold, 1979, Minoan & Mycenaean Art, The world of Art Library, History of Art, Thames and Hudson, P 1,110.
Jan son,H,W,1998, History of art, New York : Harry N. Abrams, P 98,109.
Kalman, Paula, 1958, “Depiction of the sea in the Minoan frescoes from Knossos and Akrotiri(1700- 1450Bc)”, P 53-59eh, North Western Iran”, XLIV, p. 113, 129.
Larsen, Emily, 2011, “Deconstruction Gender oppositions in the Minoan harvester Vase and Hagia Triada Sarcophagus. Studia Antiqua”.A Student Journal for the study of the Ancient World. Vole10. Birmingham Young University, P 16,37.
Mcinerney, Jermy, 2009,“Bulls and Bull-leaping in the Minoan world” , 6 volume, 53 Number 3 edition, P 7,13.
Matz, Friedrich, 1962, Crete and early Greece, Translated: Ann E, Keep, Holle Verlag GMBH, Baden Baden Germany, P 76,227.
Martino, Paula Lynne,2005, “The Hagia Triada Sarcophagus: Inter connections between Crete and Egypt in the late Bronze Age”, Faculty of Graduate School of the University of Maryland , College Park, P 1,104.
Mellink , Machteld,1983, “The origin and Iconography of the late Minoan painted Larnax”, Institute of fine Art, American school of classical studies at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Hesperia, Jstor, P 81,93.
Papaodysseus, C, M, Panagopoulos, 2008, Geometric templates used in the Akrotiri ( Thera ) wall- paintings, P 401, 408.
Schneider Adams, Laurce, 2001, A History of Western Art, 3d edition , University of New York, P 33,50.
Wiener, Malcom H, 2017,” Realities of power: The Minoan Thalassocracy in Historical perspective”, P 149,173.
-www. world Media.com,2018.

  • Receive Date 03 November 2019
  • Revise Date 11 November 2019
  • Accept Date 23 November 2019