Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi

Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi

Analyzing the reproduction of Ashura's narrative of the book of Abu Mekhnaf in the tile painting of Moaven al-Molk Tekyeh, regarding the critical discourse analysis of Norman Fairclough

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student in Art Research, Faculty of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Painting, Faculty of Art, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
In the framework of the critical discourse analysis approach, this article examines the narrative of Ashura in the tile painting of Moaven al-Molk Tekyeh. It considers visual language as a form of social action and aims to reveal the ideological underpinnings of the Ashura discourse derived from Abu Mekhnaf's book, which has been naturalized and restructured over time. This approach creates a new context for analyzing the tile painting, allowing the process of changing the structure of the source and target texts to be examined from a new perspective.
The history of analyzing Shiite thought in art shows that the visual reproduction of Shiite elements—combining beliefs, myths, and historical events—has been an effective means of exchanging human thoughts. These effects, especially in the narrative of Ashura, a turning point in the interaction of Shiite culture and thought in Qajar society, have always been considered a form of social action. However, like other social dimensions, the visual reproduction of this narrative, especially in the tile paintings of religious places like Moaven al-Molk Tekyeh, has been naturalized over time due to societal power and ideology, causing changes in its structure.
Since the reproduction of the Ashura narrative from authentic historical books is primarily derived from Abu Mekhnaf's narration, which is the earliest account of Ashura, it will be studied as the source text in this research. The visual reproduction of the Ashura tile painting of Moaven al-Molk Tekyeh, analyzed as the target text, seems to be a mental activity consciously influenced by the societal ideological orientations of the artist. Therefore, the approach of critical discourse analysis, according to Fairclough's perspectives, offers a critical and fresh look at the visual reproduction of the Ashura narrative in the tile painting, considered as a social phenomenon. This approach will reveal the ideological positions of the society on this tile painting and help develop a focused and methodical framework based on three levels: description, interpretation, and explanation.
The purpose of this research is to analyze the factors influencing the structural changes and the process of reproducing the Ashura narrative concerning Abu Mekhnaf's book in the tile painting of Moaven al-Molk Tekyeh, and to identify the effective discourses in altering the narrative's structure. The research questions are: What are the influential factors in changing the structure and the process of reproducing the Ashura narrative in the book of Abu Mekhnaf in the tile painting of Moaven al-Molk Tekyeh? Based on Norman Fairclough's critical discourse theory, what discourses have changed the structure of this narrative?
The descriptive-analytical research method is based on critical content analysis. The information-gathering tools include new forms, observation, and scanning. For the target community, one mosaic of the Ashura story has been selected from a total of twelve mosaics at Zainabieh Takya Maawanul Molk. The findings have been analyzed according to Fairclough's three-level framework. The results indicate that issues such as the emotional approach to the narrative's reproduction, specific political ideologies of the Qajar era, instrumental and material use of the narrative, and the presence of uncritical listeners (artists) have caused structural changes in the narrative. Any change, transformation, lexical and grammatical choice, persistence, and penmanship can be considered ideological, reflecting power relations and cultural and social factors.
The critical discourse of Hazrat Abbas in the form of a tile painting and its pictorial reproduction, illustrating the behavior of Imam Hossein and Hazrat Abbas, shows the negative consequences of colonialism on society. The artist created this narrative by selecting structures and pictorial elements, using symbolism and implied meanings, and referring to Shiite heroes. The frequency of these reproductions and selections in the narrative and symbols indicates changes over time.
The necessity of this research lies in the fact that significant themes like Ashura in Shiite thought can continuously evolve under political and social influences, potentially deviating from the main theme. Acquiring knowledge in this field will increase awareness and understanding of this narrative. Since many researchers and artists strive to reproduce this narrative, attention to its changes is crucial in such an environment.
Keywords

Stubbs, M. (1983). Discourse analysis: The sociolinguistic analysis of natural language (Vol. 4). University of Chicago Press. ISBN:9780226778334, 0226778339
Tannen, D. (Ed.). (1993). Framing in discourse. Oxford University Press, USA. ISBN:9780195079968, 0195079965
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse (Vol. 8). Oxford: Blackwell.
Thornborrow, J. (1995). Deborah Schiffrin, Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA & Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. Pp. x+ 470. Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 193-194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700000700
Gee, J. P. & Green, J. L. (1998). Chapter 4: Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice: A methodological study. Review of research in education, 23(1), 119-169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X02300
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249-283. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002006
Wodak, R. (2011). Critical linguistics and critical discourse analysis. Discursive pragmatics, 8, 50-70.
Zupnik, J. (1991). Norman Fairclough, Language and power. London: Longman. 1989 Pp. x 248. Language in Society, 20(2), 265-269. doi:10.1017/S0047404500016316
Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Critical discourse analysis. Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies, 277-292.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004
Frawley, W. (1993). Norman Fairclough, Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity, 1992. Pp. vii 259. Language in Society, 22(3), 421-424. doi:10.1017/S0047404500017309
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 5(11), 121-138.
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Harlow: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language ( 2nd ed.). London: Longman.
Mazid, B. M. (2014). CDA and PDA Made Simple: Language, Ideology, and Power in Politics and Media. United Kingdom: Cambridge Scholars Publisher. ISBN:9781443871709, 1443871702
Fairclough, N. L. (1985). Critical and descriptive goals in discourse analysis. Journal of pragmatics, 9(6), 739-763. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(85)90002-5
Fairclough, N. (2013). A dialectical–relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research1. In Critical discourse analysis (pp. 230-254). Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. (pp. 9-20)
Van Dijk, T. A. (2013). Ideology and discourse analysis. In The Meaning of Ideology. Routledge. (pp. 110-135)
Stockwell, P. & Whiteley, S. (Eds.). (2014). The Cambridge handbook of stylistics. Cambridge University Press.
Van Leeuwen, T. (2009). Critical discourse analysis. Discourse, of course: An overview of research in discourse studies, 277-292.
Mervin, S. (2009). مبارزه علمای اصلاح‌طلب لبنان با تحریفات عاشور. Mobârzeh-ye'olamâ-ye eslâh talab-e Lobnân bâ tahrifât e'ashurâ.‎ Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique.
 
Volume 7, Issue 4
Winter 2025
Pages 31-43

  • Receive Date 28 January 2024
  • Accept Date 19 July 2024