Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi

Rahpooye Honar-Ha-Ye Tajassomi

Examining the role of design thinking between the mind and the complexity

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD student ofIndustrial Design, Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Design, Tabriz Islamic Art University, Tabriz, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Design, Faculty of Art, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
The world is complex, and our tools have to adapt to that complexity, but things that seem very complex can seem very simple and things that seem simple can be very complex. We like products that are easy to use. But in addition to this feature, we expect it to be able to do what complex objects do. Therefore, the background of this research is from a design perspective and examines design thinking as a link between mind structures and complexity. The important issue here is the difference between complex and complicated. The word "complex" describes the state of the world, and the word "complicated" describes the state of mind. The challenge of design thinking is to mediate between complexity and the mind so that it is not complicated for the mind. 
A designer is faced with a complex situation; "Hence, the intricacies and movements of the designer, willingly or unwillingly, tend to results other than what was intended. Complexity is a quality or state that is complex and difficult to understand, do, or construct and has many interconnected parts or aspects. On the other hand, cognition is a practical and interactive activity. The whole cognitive system includes mind, action, and the world. Thinking and acting are in a physical environment. The designer's natural way of working involves that larger system by interacting with the temporary situational models he designs for it. The range of design thinking, including cognitive processes, strategic processes, and practical processes, enables the designer to "move toward the future of that particular use situation." These processes "make the world a part of cognition" and give the designer a set of "positioning strategies". Cognitive processes include attention and awareness, perception, memory and mental imagery, language, problem solving and creativity, decision making and Argument, intelligence. Strategic processes such as understanding everything, providing learning tools, grouping and organizing, meaningful communication, attractive conceptual model, signifiers, structure, modularization, automation, useful manipulation: forced operations, shaking and default, assistive devices Educational. And practical processes such as hand drawing, prototyping, scenario, model design, diagram, map, storyboard. These concepts make it clear that design thinking has certain positions and capabilities in the face of complexity.
Accordingly, in this research, first by examining the research background on the concepts of complexity and mind from the perspective of science, management and then from the perspective of design, the basic concepts and structures related to complexity in four sections of simplicity, complicatedness, complexity and chaos are extracted.
Then, the capabilities of design thinking in the face of these concepts and structures are examined.
A comparison of the four concepts of complexity in design thinking with other sciences shows that solutions have been proposed in science and management to create simplicity, reduce complicatedness and deal with complexity. In the face of chaos, for example in the realm of management, it is that it accepts chaos or avoids it extensively.
But design thinking has the ability to deal with confusion through abductive or productive reasoning.
Keywords

Asimow, Morris. (1962), Introduction to Design (Engle- wood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [1962].
Bishop, Robert. (2017), “Chaos", in Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
(Spring 2017 ed.), Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
Boeing, G. (2016), “Visual Analysis of Nonlinear Dynamical Systems: Chaos, Fractals, Self-Similarity
and the Limits of Pre- diction." Systems, 4 (4), 37.
Byrne, D. (1998), Complexity theory and the social sciences an introduction (First ed.). London & New
York: Routledge.
Clark, Andy. (2014), Mindware. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, 10016: Oxford University Press. 14,
pp. 254–256.
Cross, N. (2011), Design Thinking, Undrestanding how de- signers think and work, Berg, Oxford, New
York
Cross, N. (2001), Design Cognition: Results from Protocol and other Empirical Studies of Design
Activity, in C. Eastman, M. McCracken and W. Newstatter (eds.), Design Knowing and
Learning: Cognition in Design Education, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 79-103.
Cross, N. (1990), “The Nature and Nurture of Design Ability”, Design Studies, (11), pp. 127–140.
Danforth, Christopher M. (2013), "Chaos in an Atmosphere Hanging on a Wall". Mathematics of Planet
Earth 2013. Retrieved 12 June 2018.
Donald A. Norman. (2010), Living with Complexity, MIT Press.
Dorst, Kees. (2012), Frame Innovation: Create new thinking by design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Heylighen, A. Cavallin, H. and Bianchin, M. (2009), Design in
Mind, Design Issues: volume 25, number 1, Winter 2009, pp. 95.
Hassi L., Laakso M. (2011), Conceptions of design thinking in the design and management discourses.
In: Roozenburg NFM,
Chen LL, Stappers PJ (eds) Proceedings of IASDR2011, the 4th world conference on design research,
Delft, pp. 1–10.
Jacobs, Jane. (1961), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, New York: Random House.
Jason Winning & William Bechtel In Sophie Gibb, Robin Hendry & Tom Lancaster (eds.). (2019),
Emergence: Complex- ity, Control, and Goal-Directedness in Biological Systems, The
Routledge Handbook of Emergence. London: pp. 134-144.
Johansson-Sköldberg U., Woodilla J., Çetinkaya Şendaş M. (2013), Design thinking: past, present and
possible futures. Cre- ativity and Innovation Management, 22(2):121–146.
Johnson, Steven. (2001), Emergence: The Connected Lives of Ants, Brains, Cities. New York: Scribner.
p. 91.
Johnson, Neil F. (2009), “Chapter 1: Two's company, three is
complexity" (PDF). Simply complexity: A clear guide to com- plexity theory. Oneworld Publications.
p. 3.
Kelley T., Kelley D. (2013), Creative confidence-unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown
Business, New York.
Kellert, Stephen H. (1993), In the Wake of Chaos: Unpredictable Order in Dynamical Systems.
University of Chicago Press. pp. 32-62.
O'Connor, Timothy and Wong, Hong Yu, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). (2015), “Emergent Properties", The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mccarthy, Gabby. (2018-10-09), Introduction to Metaphysics. Scientific e-Resources.
Smart, J.J.C., "The Mind/Brain Identity Theory", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2011
Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.),
Stacey RD. Strategic management and organisational dynam- ics: the challenge of complexity. 3rd ed.
Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2002.
Sternberg, R. J. (2009), Cognitive Psychology, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, p. 578.
Tim Brown. (2008), Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, June 2008. 86(6), 84-59.
Visser, W. 2006, The cognitive artifacts of designing, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Walter Brenner, Falk Uebernickel Editors. (2016), Design Thinking for Innovation Research and
Practice, Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016
Weaver, Warren. (1948), “Science and Complexity". American Scientist. 36: 536-44.
Weisstein, Eric W. "Chaos", mathworld.wolfram.com
Werndl, Charlotte. (2009), “What are the New Implications of Chaos for Unpredictability?”. The British
Journal for the Philos- ophy of Science. 60 (1): 195–220.
Zayed J. M., Nouvel N., Rauwald U., Scherman O. A. (2010), Chemical Complexity - supramolecular
self-assembly of syn- thetic and biological building blocks in water. Chemical Society Reviews,
39, 2806-2816.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973), Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences,
4(2), 155–169.
https://fractalfoundation.org/resources/what-is-chaos-theory/
https://www.britannica.com/science/chaos-theory
Volume 4, Issue 4
Winter 2022
Pages 75-84

  • Receive Date 05 April 2021
  • Revise Date 23 March 0621
  • Accept Date 11 July 2021